<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sous vide at home &#8211; 72 hours pork ribs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/</link>
	<description>A blog about cooking with low temperatures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:06:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home Cooked: Sous Vide Baby Back Ribs 57.3C 72h &#171; Food In Singapore and the Rest of the World</title>
		<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Home Cooked: Sous Vide Baby Back Ribs 57.3C 72h &#171; Food In Singapore and the Rest of the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 14:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sousvidecooking.org/?p=901#comment-837</guid>
		<description>[...] for 72h (From this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for 72h (From this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ze</title>
		<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>ze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sousvidecooking.org/?p=901#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Jayson, the whole thing about always cooking pork to well done came from a well-founded fear of a nasty little disease called trichinosis. However, trichinosis was eradicated from commercials pigs quite some time ago. Wikipedia has a little more on the subject.

All this to call bullshit on the 69C, eat all the rare pork you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jayson, the whole thing about always cooking pork to well done came from a well-founded fear of a nasty little disease called trichinosis. However, trichinosis was eradicated from commercials pigs quite some time ago. Wikipedia has a little more on the subject.</p>
<p>All this to call bullshit on the 69C, eat all the rare pork you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla</title>
		<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sousvidecooking.org/?p=901#comment-348</guid>
		<description>I recommend you have a look at Baldwin&#039;s Sous Vide Guide that includes Temp/Time tables. 55
°C can be enought depending of the cooking time. 18 minutes cooking could also be enough depending of the thickness of the meat. http://amath.colorado.edu/~baldwind/sous-vide.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend you have a look at Baldwin&#8217;s Sous Vide Guide that includes Temp/Time tables. 55<br />
°C can be enought depending of the cooking time. 18 minutes cooking could also be enough depending of the thickness of the meat. <a href="http://amath.colorado.edu/~baldwind/sous-vide.html" rel="nofollow">http://amath.colorado.edu/~baldwind/sous-vide.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson</title>
		<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sousvidecooking.org/?p=901#comment-346</guid>
		<description>BTW re previous post have seen the table on this website, was just wondering if there were any other similar details on other websites, it seems to be a very inexact science, I&#039;ve seen recipes suggesting from 18 minutes in a water bath to 3 days for the same piece of pork!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW re previous post have seen the table on this website, was just wondering if there were any other similar details on other websites, it seems to be a very inexact science, I&#8217;ve seen recipes suggesting from 18 minutes in a water bath to 3 days for the same piece of pork!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayson</title>
		<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sousvidecooking.org/?p=901#comment-345</guid>
		<description>I thought the minimum safe cooking temp for pork was 69 degrees C to kill off bacteria...?  Am going to use my slow cooker&#039;s keep warm facility which I&#039;ve measured at 75degrees to cook some pork fillet for 24 hrs - I&#039;ll let you know how that works out.  Haven&#039;t found any recommended time/temperature combinations so far on the web - any ideas for various meats?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the minimum safe cooking temp for pork was 69 degrees C to kill off bacteria&#8230;?  Am going to use my slow cooker&#8217;s keep warm facility which I&#8217;ve measured at 75degrees to cook some pork fillet for 24 hrs &#8211; I&#8217;ll let you know how that works out.  Haven&#8217;t found any recommended time/temperature combinations so far on the web &#8211; any ideas for various meats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris shenton</title>
		<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>chris shenton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sousvidecooking.org/?p=901#comment-189</guid>
		<description>I did beef short ribs at 140F for 72 hours and they were outstanding: red-pink like rare steak, tender like great steak, and insanely flavorful -- rich from the collagen and fat in the ribs.  Also did a spice rub on a beef brisket, smoked lightly for an hour, then cooked sous vide at 142 for 70 hours and it was devoured immediately: pink interior, red smoke-ringy area, tender, moist... and a lot easier than tending the smoker all day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did beef short ribs at 140F for 72 hours and they were outstanding: red-pink like rare steak, tender like great steak, and insanely flavorful &#8212; rich from the collagen and fat in the ribs.  Also did a spice rub on a beef brisket, smoked lightly for an hour, then cooked sous vide at 142 for 70 hours and it was devoured immediately: pink interior, red smoke-ringy area, tender, moist&#8230; and a lot easier than tending the smoker all day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sousvidecooking.org/?p=901#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t have pork ribs, but I did have belly pork and that came out beautifully tender. Thanks for your blog, it&#039;s hard to find information on SV cooking. My first effort was 24hr Ox Tongue and that was not a success!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t have pork ribs, but I did have belly pork and that came out beautifully tender. Thanks for your blog, it&#8217;s hard to find information on SV cooking. My first effort was 24hr Ox Tongue and that was not a success!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean-francois</title>
		<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>jean-francois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 05:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sousvidecooking.org/?p=901#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Mauricio,

Strange. I also cooked my pork ribs at 57°C. What kind of sous vide cooker did you use? 

Jean-François</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mauricio,</p>
<p>Strange. I also cooked my pork ribs at 57°C. What kind of sous vide cooker did you use? </p>
<p>Jean-François</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauricio Franco</title>
		<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauricio Franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sousvidecooking.org/?p=901#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Jean Francois,   

I just opened my 72 hours sous vide pork ribs at 57o.C and it did not meet my expectations. Do you think that a little higher temperature would make it even more tender? My result was parts very tender and special and some other parts a little bit dry and with some fibers. Any suggestions?

Great blog

Mauricio Franco - Brazil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean Francois,   </p>
<p>I just opened my 72 hours sous vide pork ribs at 57o.C and it did not meet my expectations. Do you think that a little higher temperature would make it even more tender? My result was parts very tender and special and some other parts a little bit dry and with some fibers. Any suggestions?</p>
<p>Great blog</p>
<p>Mauricio Franco &#8211; Brazil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean-francois</title>
		<link>http://www.sousvidecooking.org/sous-vide-at-home-72-hours-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>jean-francois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sousvidecooking.org/?p=901#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Richard,

I also think most cooking times should be below 12 hours. My trial with 72 hours pork ribs sous vide was for me like a gag. I would have never dared doing this if I would not have seen other poeple doing the same on the net. In the end this was amazing.

Jean-François</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>I also think most cooking times should be below 12 hours. My trial with 72 hours pork ribs sous vide was for me like a gag. I would have never dared doing this if I would not have seen other poeple doing the same on the net. In the end this was amazing.</p>
<p>Jean-François</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

